Supporting developing country partners to effectively engage with GPE
Earlier this year, Universalia conducted an independent evaluation to analyze the effectiveness of the DCP pre-Board constituency meetings in supporting a stronger engagement and voice for the DCP constituencies in GPE’s governance. The findings demonstrate that these meetings are delivering a substantial value for money, and that partner countries see a clear benefit in these opportunities to come together.
August 21, 2017 by Michelle Mesen, Global Partnership for Education
|
5 minutes read
Participants from Asia and Pacific, East Asia, Central Asia, Middle East, Latin America and the Caribbean who prepared the GPE Board meeting of December 15-16, 2014 in Washington. Credit: GPE/Chantal Rigaud
Participants from Asia and Pacific, East Asia, Central Asia, Middle East, Latin America and the Caribbean who prepared the GPE Board meeting of December 15-16, 2014 in Washington.
Credit: GPE/Chantal Rigaud

Since 2014, the Global Partnership for Education has been facilitating a platform for collaborative development that brings together its 65 developing country partners (DCPs) ahead of the biannual GPE Board of Directors meetings. 

These pre-Board constituency meetings, as we call them, help strengthen the role of GPE developing country partners in the governance of the partnership – something that is core to our understanding of a strong partnership. The meetings foster the engagement of GPE’s developing country partners in decision-making, strategy, policy, and advocacy processes, so that decisions made at the global level can make a positive impact at the country level.

The meetings also help promote the sharing of good practices among the countries, to allow the partners to address and overcome common challenges they face. 

An independent evaluation confirming the value of pre-Board constituency meetings

Between February and June 2017, Universalia conducted an independent evaluation to analyze the extent to which the DCP pre-Board constituency meetings are meeting their objective of supporting a stronger engagement and voice for the DCP constituencies in the governance of GPE. 

Overall, the findings demonstrate that the DCP pre-Board meetings are delivering a substantial value for money, and that partner countries see a clear benefit in these opportunities to come together. 

The evaluation confirms that the engagement of DCP constituency representatives on the GPE Board has increased, and DCP Board members feel that their ability to represent their constituencies has improved. That’s primarily because the meetings provide an opportunity for DCP constituencies to consult and coordinate their position prior to Board meetings.

The findings also demonstrate that DCP pre-Board meetings are an effective mechanism for consultations between the GPE Secretariat and DCPs because they allow for increased knowledge and understanding of GPE’s policies, goals and objectives and have helped participants to better understand proposed Board decisions. 

Making the meetings more efficient

The evaluation also highlights a few areas that can be improved to make the meetings more efficient. Feedback highlighted in particular time constraints resulting from jam-packed agendas at the meetings and lack of time to consult with education ministries at home. We also understand that knowledge and good practice exchange and peer-to-peer learning between the participants is in high demand and we look forward to increasing our efforts in this area.

Looking ahead

The evaluation offers useful recommendations to make the DCP pre-Board meetings more efficient. One idea is to establish a working group of DCP representatives and GPE Secretariat staff to develop the meeting agendas jointly to ensure that there is sufficient time and attention placed on the items of most interest to our developing country partners.  The first meeting of this working group is planned for late September to prepare for the next DCP pre-Board meeting at the end of November. 

The GPE Secretariat remains committed to ensure that DCP pre-Board constituency meetings continue to serve as a valuable resource to developing country partners, and as a key vehicle for ensuring that their voice and contributions are fully reflected throughout the entire partnership.

Related blogs

Comments

Firstly l am thankful to the GPE for the providing the funds needed for such a worthy cost. I am of the hope that other countries will soon benefit from this program.

Secondly , l am in total agreement with goals and aims of the student identification system developers and the brains behind this system , that it will improved and reduced cost , for the sector (education) in Kenya. Moreover, there are many demographic and statistics benefits that will be achieved through this project. Besides , the child's record over the years can be quickly seen for decision making , etc.
Lastly , l believed that this system when implement will greatly help in organizing and or help to reorganize the education sector in Kenya. As a Liberian early childhood educator, l am advocating and will continued to advocate for this Student Identification System ( SIS) deployment in all schools in Liberia .
In Appreciation of this project , l Remained
David R Sonjor

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • Global and entity tokens are replaced with their values. Browse available tokens.
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.