12 key findings from GPE’s Results Report 2019
GPE just released its annual results report, showing the progress of the partnership in implementing its 5-year strategy and the areas where more attention is needed.
June 24, 2019 by Jo Bourne, Global Partnership for Education
5 minutes read
Students at Sandogo B Primary School in District 7, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Credit: GPE/Kelley Lynch
Third grade students at Sandogo B Primary School in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. A GPE partner since 2002, Burkina Faso has seen a sharp increase in primary completion rates, from 27% in 2002 to 64% in 2017.
Credit: GPE/Kelley Lynch

Today GPE releases its Results Report 2019, which monitors the progress of the partnership against its goals and objectives as stated in GPE 2020, our 5-year strategy.

Over the coming weeks, we will publish a series of blog posts unpacking the key results of the report and associated evidence in greater detail, focusing on what we can learn. 

But first, what are the headlines of this year’s report? 

Let’s start with GPE’s 3 goals, which focus on improved and more equitable learning and access to education through stronger and more efficient education systems.  It’s important to note that even though GPE partners make efforts to achieve these goals, outcomes ultimately depend on a wide variety of factors beyond GPE’s reach.

Top 6 findings on GPE’s goals

1. More children are completing basic education

An estimated 4.9 million more children completed primary school and 2.6 million more completed lower secondary school over the previous year. In countries affected by fragility and conflict, the primary completion rate is still lagging but showing progress.

2. The opportunity gaps between rich and poor children, and between rural and urban children, are large but narrowing

In countries affected by fragility and conflict, for example, 42 rural children completed lower secondary school for every 100 urban children in 2018, compared with 39 in 2017. In the same countries, 20 children from the poorest households completed lower secondary school for every 100 children from the richest households in 2018, compared with 18 in 2017.

3. GPE partner countries are building stronger systems to assess learning

48% of partner countries now have a learning assessment system that meets quality standards, compared with 40% in 2015. Building these systems is crucial to ensure that governments know what is working to improve learning, what is not, and where to direct resources.

4. Parity between girls and boys completing school is improving, but still elusive at the lower secondary level

The proportion of partner countries that are approaching equal numbers of girls and boys completing school rose to 67% for primary, and to 54% for lower secondary. 

5. Many education systems face challenges in efficiency

Across 25 partner countries, more than a third of all education spending covers the costs of repetition and dropout. Moreover, teachers are often not distributed evenly within countries, resulting in certain regions being disadvantaged.

6. Countries affected by fragility and conflict face more acute challenges in multiple areas

Less than 70% of children complete primary school in partner countries affected by fragility and conflict, compared to nearly 77% in partner countries overall. Gender disparities, and especially girls’ disadvantage, are more pronounced in fragile countries. These countries are also much more likely to have larger class sizes, and less likely to have education plans that include strategies for overcoming constraints. Countries affected by fragility and conflict also face acute challenges to mobilize domestic resources for education.

Results report 2019
View the full results report

Top 6 findings on GPE’s objectives

GPE’s 5 objectives focus on the levers that the partnership has for catalyzing progress toward our goals.  These are the areas where GPE can have the most direct impact: sector planning and monitoring, financing and partnership. 

  1. GPE partner countries are developing stronger education sector plans

100% of education sector plans of partner countries now meet quality standards, up from 58% in 2015. GPE support to plan quality during this time has included the Education Sector Plan Preparation and Appraisal Guidelines developed with UNESCO’s International Institute for Educational Planning, the education sector plan development grant, a new quality assurance process, and a GPE funding model requirement concerning the quality of the plan. Still, one-third of education sector plans, mostly those in countries affected by fragility and conflict, are rated as “not achievable,” meaning that they do not include sufficient analysis of the financial constraints and implementation challenges to overcome.

2. Local education groups are becoming more inclusive

59% of local education groups now involve teacher organizations, and 89% involve civil society organizations – up from 56% and 87% respectively in 2017. This means that the policy dialogue and sector planning process in many partner countries is more reflective of the views of all stakeholders.

Meeting of the local educaiton group in Senegal. Credit: GPE/Carine Durand
A meeting of the local education group in Dakar, Senegal, in 2018. The group includes representatives from civil society organizations, parent groups and teacher organizations.
GPE/Carine Durand

3. GPE grants emphasize learning

As of June 2018, 40% of active implementation grants were allocated to activities that aim to improve learning, amounting to an investment of almost US$600 million. Of GPE’s three strategic goals, partner countries allocated the largest amount of grant funding to learning. In addition, 88% of implementation grants supported activities related to learning assessment.

4. GPE provides strong support to countries affected by fragility and conflict

As of June 2018, 65% of all active implementation grants were for countries affected by fragility and conflict, in line with GPE’s mission to focus on the most marginalized children. GPE provides a comprehensive suite of support to these countries, including three special funding mechanisms, and assistance with developing transitional education plans.

5. Monitoring of plan implementation can be improved

Monitoring of the implementation of education sector plans is poor. Fewer than half of partner countries organized a joint sector review in 2018, and just over a quarter of these reviews met quality standards. 

6. More aligned and harmonized aid modalities are needed

While all GPE grants are aligned to national sector plans, two-thirds use stand-alone mechanisms that are poorly aligned with national systems. More aligned and harmonized modalities, both in GPE grants and in the financing and projects of donors who are GPE partners, would significantly increase GPE’s ability to contribute to successful education sector plan implementation, and thus system strengthening.

What’s next?

The Results Report’s monitoring efforts complement the evaluations that GPE has recently commissioned and received, such as the Effective Partnership Review and the country-level evaluations, to help GPE reflect on its successes and its opportunities for growth. 

Together, these will inform important conversations to come as the partnership begins to lay the groundwork for its next strategic plan and result framework.

Stay tuned for the rest of the blogs in this series, which will dive deeper into key results in areas such as gender equality, teachers, and learning outcomes across and within partner countries.

Post a comment or

Latest blogs

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • Global and entity tokens are replaced with their values. Browse available tokens.
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.