Skip to main content
Global Partnership for Education
Transforming education Focus areas
Partner countries
GPE impact Key results Country journeys Results stories
How we work Knowledge and innovation Advocacy and accountability Technical assistance initiatives Monitoring, evaluation and learning Alignment and aid effectiveness
Sustainable financing Domestic financing Innovative financing How to apply for grants Financial reporting Grant data Replenishment
About GPE Partners Donors Youth leaders Board of Directors Secretariat
Case for investment Next stop: Possibility Education champions
Document library
News
Blog
Body
  • Document library
  • News
  • Blog
Global Partnership for Education
  • Home
  • Transforming education Focus areas
  • Partner countries
  • GPE impact Key results Country journeys Results stories
  • How we work Knowledge and innovation Advocacy and accountability Technical assistance initiatives Monitoring, evaluation and learning Alignment and aid effectiveness
  • Sustainable financing Domestic financing Innovative financing How to apply for grants Financial reporting Grant data Replenishment
  • About GPE Partners Donors Youth leaders Board of Directors Secretariat
  • Case for investment Next stop: Possibility Education champions
  • Home
  • Document library
  • Current: Effective joint sector reviews as (mutual) accountability platforms
Effective joint sector reviews as (mutual) accountability platforms
June 27, 2017
(0) Likes
Share
Effective joint sector reviews as (mutual) accountability platforms

This paper examines the ways in which joint sector reviews (JSRs) contribute to the development of mutual accountability in an aid environment and may be most effective as instruments of a domestic policy cycle.

Using a wide variety of sources, including an extended literature review, interviews with key education stakeholders in five countries and data collected from a desk-based analysis of 39 JSRs, the paper addresses two questions: (1) How are JSRs perceived as promoting (mutual) accountability? and (2) How is mutual accountability likely to be affected by JSR effectiveness?

The research suggests a less unified understanding of mutual accountability across key stakeholders than is touted in international development rhetoric. The paper therefore offers a more nuanced model of mutual accountability and the ways in which this intersects with JSRs that encompasses an expanded understanding of responsibilities and channels of responsibility.

The research team identified 5 interconnected dimensions of effective JSRs that served as framework for analyzing 39 JSRs.

Download working paper below or read the key takeaways  

 

Download
Document type: Working papers
Monitoring and evaluation
Year: 2017

Learn more

  • Benefits of education
  • Education data highlights
  • Education in the eye of the storm
  • Frequently asked questions
  • Branding
  • Contact us
  • Careers
  • Events

Connect with us

Body

Stay informed with our latest news

Body

© 2026 Global Partnership for Education. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy policy
  • Site map
  • Terms of use
  • Report fraud and abuse
  • Risk management